From the Davenport/North Coast Association Facebook page: “Innovative, creative, passionate and committed barely begin to describe Big Creek’s co-founder, Homer T. “Bud” McCrary. To some, he has long been known as a pioneer of sustainable forestry. To others, a champion of community trails, an instigator of epic trail-building adventures and a cultivator of inventive mechanical solutions. His employees considered him a mentor and a friend. All of us are deeply saddened to share that on June 1, 2020, Bud peacefully passed away at his beloved home in the redwoods of Santa Cruz County at the age of 93. We will remember him as a loving father and family man, a passionate leader in our community and a tireless advocate for sound forest management and for his treasured employees. Bud led an extraordinary yet humble life. Born in Santa Cruz in 1927, he served in the Navy during World War II. Bud came home in 1946 to start Big Creek Lumber with his brother Frank “Lud” McCrary, uncle Homer Trumbo, and father Frank McCrary Sr. What started as a modest endeavor with crosscut saws and war bonds grew, with Bud’s determination, into the thriving Big Creek Lumber of today that Bud has always been proud to call his team. One of Bud’s greatest legacies was his contribution to forestry in the state of California, especially its Central Coast. Bud was influential in pioneering a style of selective forest thinning during a time when clearcutting was the prevailing practice. Nearly two decades after Big Creek Lumber instituted Bud’s single-tree selection harvesting methods, the counties of San Mateo, Santa Cruz and Santa Clara adopted this method of forestry as special county rules under state law. We witness Bud’s legacy when we look at the vibrant forestlands of the Central Coast – forestlands that continue to contribute to the well-being of all. Bud was a leader of Big Creek Lumber for many years, and we are fortunate that he had the foresight for a succession plan to ensure that Big Creek Lumber and his vision will continue for many years into the future. Bud would ask us not to be sad, but to continue to drive forward with his hard-working spirit, creativity, and ingenuity in our hearts. Thank you Bud, you will be dearly missed.”
0 Comments
On January 12, 2017, then-President Obama, under the auspices of the National Antiquities Act, proclaimed Coast Dairies a national monument. Out of respect for the history of the 5,800 acre property that stretches from Highway One up into Bonny Doon, he added the name of the Cotoni band of Amah Matsun people, who used to inhabit the area, to the Coast Dairies name.
Responding to concerns raised by the Rural Bonny Doon Association and the Davenport North Coast Association, in April 2015 the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors approved a resolution that based their support for the monument on a set of conditions that would help mitigate the impacts of the increased visitation that properties designated as monuments attracts. The Proclamation fails to meet several of those conditions, starting with the inclusion of Cotoni-Coast Dairies as part of the California Coastal National Monument (CCNM), the huge expanse of water and coastal rocks that stretches along California’s shoreline. (The Supervisors resolution specifically stated, “There should be no implication in the Proclamation that the National Monument is adjacent to the California Coastal National Monument.” Instead, Coast Dairies is now part of the CCNM.) Several critical aspects of the Proclamation don’t meet the criteria set by the Supervisors for support of monument status. For example, Condition 10 is that “Long-term funding from private, as well as public, institutions should be secured to assure adequate management of the Monument.” While Sempervirens Fund, which initiated and spearheaded the campaign for monument status, has promised some funding, it is paltry compared to the amount needed for “adequate management.” More importantly, the Dept. of Interior, which manages Coast Dairies through the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), has long been pinched for funding by the Republican dominated Congress, and the Trump Administration will almost certainly be opposed to increasing Interior’s budget. In fact, a shrinking of Interior’s budget is more likely to occur. Condition 3 stated that “The Proclamation designating the National Monument shall contain a commitment that the National Monument Management Plan shall: a. Be comprehensive and specific to the land included in the Coast Dairies National Monument.” The Proclamation made no mention of that, and it seems that the management plan may instead be made part of the CCNM management plan. The Proclamation also ignores Condition 2, which calls for the management plan to be completed within 3 years. Condition 3f. said the Proclamation should direct that the management plan “Assure that local fire and rescue services are not overburdened by increased use.” No such language is in the Proclamation. Condition 3g. demanded that a fee-for-service be negotiated for emergency services, and take into consideration “costs that occur off the property as a result of its public use.” Again, not in the Proclamation. Condition 9 was that “There should be no specific reference to plant communities not specifically listed as endangered on Federal or California state endangered species lists.” The Proclamation specifically names several such plant communities. The big question now is whether there will be enough additional funding, from public and private sources, to minimize the impacts of greatly increased visitation on the flora and fauna, on the neighboring communities of Davenport and Bonny Doon, and on local emergency and law enforcement services. As for the increased traffic, especially on Highway 1/Mission St., but also on Highways 17 and 92, and on Bonny Doon and Felton Empire roads, we find it hard to come up with any viable solutions. We hope, though by no means expect, that the Supervisors will actively pressure the BLM, which most likely will continue to manage Cotoni-Coast Dairies, to live up to the conditions their Resolution demanded. Sempervirens Fund and other organizations that pushed monument status on us have a moral obligation to make this work as best as possible. Those of us who fought this designation, on the grounds that Coast Dairies was already fully protected and that greatly increased visitation would have only negative consequences, also have an obligation to try to make the best of this, through public participation in the management plan process, oversight of BLM’s implementation of the management plan, and by volunteering our time as docents on the property itself. |
Categories
All
Archives
March 2024
|